Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Liviu
e8deaa60b6 Licence hygiene, authoritative patches, and one spelling of the brand
- Apache 2.0 section 4(b): the patches modify files that are the work of
  Hyperledger Besu and now say so, with the notice inside the modified files,
  which is what the licence asks for and what applying the patch produces.
- patches/ and precompiles/ now carry the staged versions rather than an older
  export. The two had drifted in both directions; the only thing the published
  copy had that the staged one lacked was the word "audited" in front of Bouncy
  Castle, which we cannot evidence and which the staged version had dropped.
- the brand was spelled two ways in the same repository, 62 times one way and 23
  the other. It is Aere Network; AERE is the ticker. The 96 AERE_* code
  identifiers are untouched.
2026-08-11 23:47:17 +03:00
Liviu
6efc348f83 Replace the MIT LICENSE file with Apache 2.0, and add NOTICE
Every source file in this repository carries SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0,
and the README has always said Apache 2.0. The LICENSE file said MIT. It was the
only thing in the repository that disagreed, and it was wrong.

This code derives from Hyperledger Besu, which is Apache 2.0. Several files sit in
Besu's own packages because that is where the client loads them from. Publishing
that under MIT was not a choice we were free to make, and it is not one we made
knowingly.

The LICENSE file now contains the Apache 2.0 text as published by the Apache
Software Foundation, byte for byte (sha256 cfc7749b96f63bd31c3c42b5c471bf756814053e847c10f3eb003417bc523d30).
NOTICE records the derivation from Besu.

Nothing about the terms these files were offered under has changed: the file
headers governed before this commit and govern after it. The correction is
recorded in the README rather than made silently, because a licence is the one
thing in a repository a reader should not have to verify.
2026-08-11 23:35:21 +03:00